The EMR information-sharing service is being developed as a mechanism to safely share clinical information between medical institutions and use it for patient care. Hospitals are required to be able to correctly output the target documents and information in a standard form.
This article organizes preparation for the so-called three documents and six information items as procedures, from the perspectives of output confirmation, connection requirements, data quality, and infrastructure review. Because names, targets, and timing may be revised, please read on the premise of confirming primary sources.
What are the three documents and six information items
The three documents are generally said to refer to the medical information provision letter, the discharge summary, and the health checkup result report. The six information items are said to cover foundational clinical information such as diagnoses, allergies, infectious diseases, drug contraindications, tests, and prescriptions. The starting point is to grasp where and in what form your hospital holds these.
To handle these in a shareable form, it is premised that records are tied to specific items and can be output in a standard format. Note that the more information relies on free-text entry, the more effort it tends to require in later handling. It is good to start by taking stock of how far current records are itemized.
The standardization trend of HL7 FHIR
In information sharing, the direction of exchanging data in line with an international standard called HL7 FHIR is indicated. Following the standard makes it easier to treat information as having the same meaning even between different systems, increasing interoperability of sharing.
What matters on the hospital side is the implementation aspect of whether your data can be converted and output into a standard form, more than the details of the standard itself. It is good to confirm early with the vendor how far the existing EMR supports this and whether additional modifications are needed.
Standardization does not end once addressed; the standard itself is updated through successive versions. Whether there is a maintenance mechanism to keep up with future versions is a perspective worth confirming. Looking not only at immediate output capability but at a structure that can continuously keep aligned with the standard is reassuring.
How to prepare and the confirmation procedure
Preparation is easier to grasp as a whole when starting from confirming output support. Confirming the following perspectives in order concretizes the work your hospital needs.
- Output support: confirm with the vendor whether the three documents and six information items can be output in a standard format
- Connection requirements: identify the requirements needed for connection, such as network and security
- Schedule confirmation: confirm by when and what should be arranged via primary sources and turn it into a plan
- Data quality check: inspect whether key information is itemized and recorded in a standard form
- Role assignment: assign responsibilities across IT, medical affairs, and clinical departments to prevent oversight
How to ensure data quality
Shared information may be used in another hospital's clinical decisions. That is precisely why it is important that diagnoses, allergies, prescriptions, and the like are recorded accurately and in a standard form. Notation variation and reliance on free-text become causes of meaning not being conveyed correctly during sharing.
Taking this as an opportunity to review input operations in line with standard codes and masters stabilizes sharing quality. Because daily recording practices determine the final sharing quality, it is effective to advance field awareness and input-rule development in parallel.
Reviewing the cloud infrastructure
For stable connection with external services, whether the in-hospital infrastructure can accommodate it is also a point. Evaluating early, from the perspectives of network, security, and availability, whether the existing infrastructure suffices or needs review helps avoid later rush.
The cloud infrastructure Sakigake Platform is designed as a foundation that anticipates standard-compliant data handling and connection with external services, aiming to support the response to information sharing from the infrastructure side. Requirement confirmation matched to your hospital's configuration is effective.
Common misconceptions and pitfalls
The misconception that using an EMR means you can share as-is is dangerous. In practice, it is premised that information is itemized and can be output in a standard form, and operations with much free-text require effort to comply. A perspective of reviewing from recording practices is essential.
Another pitfall is treating the response as only the system department's job. Because data quality depends on daily records, without involving clinical departments and medical affairs, it ends as a superficial response. Involving stakeholders early is the dividing line for success.
How to approach the regulatory side
The service's name, target documents and information, connection requirements, and timing may be revised. Fixed internal announcements cause confusion at each change. It is safest to factor in the possibility of shifting premises and keep operational documents easy to update.
Please confirm the latest content with primary sources such as the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare. Assigning a person to continuously follow official information and having a mechanism to reflect schedule and requirement updates internally reduces falling behind.
Building the structure to advance the response
Because the response spans multiple departments, deciding a leader and each department's responsible person early is key. Clarifying role assignments, such as IT handling the technical side, medical affairs the operational side, and clinical departments the content of records, reduces oversight. Setting up regular meetings to check progress prevents stagnation.
Also, a perspective of not ending the response as a one-off task but embedding it into daily routine as a recording practice is essential. Once standard-compliant input becomes a habit, you can respond relatively smoothly to future regulatory changes and new sharing requirements. An attitude of continuously arranging both infrastructure and operations is effective.
Summary
Preparation for the EMR information-sharing service starts from confirming output support for the three documents and six information items, then proceeds to understanding standardization, ensuring data quality, and reviewing infrastructure. Because recording practices and data quality determine the final sharing value, involving clinical departments and medical affairs, not just IT, is the key. Confirm names and timing with primary sources as needed and prepare steadily with operations resilient to updates.
RELATED